| [Spiritual Structure Home] | [Whole Being Explorations  Host Site]  | [Subscribe Here] | 
| [Sources] | 
  If all memory is the province of citta, then does the  atimanas kosa, which holds the 
 samskaras have a  citta component? If so then it 
would seem unlikely that there is a straight forward correlation 
between the kosas and the  tattvas, e.g. 
that kamamaya kosa is citta, manomaya and atimanas are aham and 
vijinanamaya and hiranmaya are mahat. Perhaps each kosa is 
comprised of all three, but in differing proportions? Or there 
is some overlap?
  Ananda Sutram 3-1 implies that the kosas are all part of the
manifest mind and separate from the Aham and Mahat, thereby implying
that they form in the citta? However, other passages suggest that 
together with the atman they form the whole being? E.g. in AS 3-5
it is said that a disembodied soul has no sense of pain or pleasure,
which is the province of Aham Tattva and suggests that in death the
Aham is also desolved? Or is it rather that without the crudest
kosas the aham and citta do not function as fully as with them?
  Based on the functions given for the  kosas, 
the  lokas and the 
influence of the gunas (table above), one would have to give a rough 
correspondence as follows: annamaya and kamamaya kosa are related to 
mainly to the  citta, the manomaya mainly 
to the  aham, the atimanas kosa to both 
the  aham and the  
mahat, and the vijinanamaya and hiranamya kosas to the  mahat. It is likely that there is not more 
than a general correspondence between these two classifications, which 
are to some extent orthogonal rather than parallel. 
 On the other hand `samanya deha' is said to be a level of pure
mahat and aham, beyond the kosas. This would suggest that all five
of the kosas exist within the citta. ??? This is hard to reconcile
with all the rest.
  NOTE: In P. R. Sakar's usage, consciousness
and mind are quite different concepts, with mind being a partial
manifestation of consciousness, which is more fundamental.
 
  The correlations between the Esoteric and other columns is not clear. In some works there is
an Etheric body between the physical and astral bodies. 
 
 The standard  psychic and new age view is
rather that higher levels involve higher frequencies and shorter
wave-lengths, i.e. higher energies. 
 In Valerie Hunt's work she was measuring  
electromagnetic frequencies in the body. These were much higher 
frequency than brain wave signals, and did show a good correlation 
with psychic visualization of energies during healing processes. 
These were also different from the regular brain-wave signals, both
in frequency and strength. [Was there any attempt to measure these 
signals during meditation sessions?]
 
 This suggests that we are talking about two different aspects of
mind or energy bodies. This also relates to the different views of
the chakras in the yogic and psychic literatures. Motoyama suggests
that this arises from viewing different levels or aspects of the 
chakras. [Review this after finishing review of Ananda Sutram. If
the relationship of the kosas all manifest in the citta, then that
changes things.]
 If one is `seeing' something, even in the sixth chakra (the `inner 
eye') this is still an image in the citta, however, that does not mean 
that the citta is picking out or generating the image. Likewise it may
not mean that one is using a high level kosa either. What levels of 
mind are involved on both sides of the process. Perhaps most psychic work 
actually involving the physical mind and actual physcial energy fields? 
When the chakras are `read' this must all beat the same level of the 
being, just as they all have physcial glands. If so which level is being 
`seen'? Are all the aura levels also on the same level? It makes most 
sense that most of this is taking place in the standard 3  yogic mental layers or kosas.
 Michael Tamura has said that clairvoyance is working with the 
transmedium space, the space between the conscious mind and the spiritual.
This would imply that one is using manomaya or atimanas kosas. It ought
to involve the mahat which is where the intuition lies, so we are back
to the kosa/guna question. if it is the manomaya, then it may be that 
the  work with pictures ect. is not really 
working at the root samskara level, which involves the atimanas. This 
is a key point. 
 
 
  The various stages of  psychological
development can be associated with different 
chakras. In this way the psychology of the  Freudian anal stage relates to that
of the  muladhara chakra. The psychology 
of the  Freudian phallic stage relates 
to that of the  svadhisthana chakra.  
 Adler's and Erikson's work with
inferiority are related to the psychology of the  manipura chakra. The psychology of the
 anahata chakra is reflected in the 
work of  Rogers and Fromm. [Y&P]
  The  Freudian oral stage is
seen as being an immature reflection of the nurturing psychology of the
 vishuda chakra. While the development
related to the vishuda is that of devotion and trust in the infinite, 
the infant displays a trust in the mother. However, this is not a 
conscious devotion, and may come and go as needs are met or not met. 
The first of which, if not outgrown, leads to  
attachments to material objects and persons (finite objects) and a
desire for (or a fear of) merger in them and annihilation of the 
conscious self (issues of the  muladhara). 
The other leads to an attachment to God (infinite object) and a desire 
to loose the self by expansion into the universal consciousness (true
 vishuda issues). The surface similarities 
of these two states has led to a confusion in many  western psychologies, which identify the 
transcendence of the yogi with the dissolution of the psychotic. This 
mirrors the  association of both 
the higher and lower aspects of mind into a single  unconscious. 
 
  There is an apparent confusion between the use of "conscious", 
"subconscious", and "unconscious" mind in the theory of the  kosas and the use of "conscious" and 
"unconscious" in  western psychology,
The "conscious" of psychology really has more to do with the range
of  ahamtattva than with a specific
layer of the mind. As one progresses in  
sadhana, or other  clearing
techniques, the consciousness expands and ones awareness may be 
seated in the higher kosas. It is also common to associate the 
"rational", intellectual mind with consciousness. And yet this is
the province of the analytical  
manomaya kosa which is called the "subconscious" layer of mind.
It is true that much of the process of actual analysis may be 
"unconscious", but when we work through an engineering problem it
seems quite conscious. 
  Note that the conscious mind is presented with  perceptions that are layered with
meaning, the analytical function of the subconscious mind. This
process of giving meaning, is mostly not part of our conscious
awareness, though it can be brought into consciousness when 
a new object or context is not immediately recognizable. It is
generally connected with the 
emotions, in that there is an emotional aspect to the meaning.  
Meaning is probably also relative to some  reference point, which may be the 
person's own  body image. The
emotional content apparently depends on a clear relationship
between the self and the perceived object [SFF]. It is suggested
that all  meaningful perception is
dependent on self-reference, without which consciousness and
understanding would be impossible [SFF]. This would only apply
to the physical world of the  five factors.
  It is an interesting question if our "other bodies", i.e. the
other  layers of the mind also serve as 
reference points for experience on other levels? Certainly there
can be no space, and any sense of that must be imported from the 
experience of the  physical body.
Time also would be perhaps only relative, and have little absolute
meaning (as in dreams). However, there is certainly still 
consciousness and understanding.
 
 
 The  Gunas and the Kosas
The Influence of the Gunas on the Kosas
KOSA Dominant Intermediate 
	Minimal annamaya tamas rajas satvas kamamaya tamas satvas rajas manomaya rajas tamas satvas atimanas rajas satvas tamas vijinanamaya satvas tamas rajas hiranmaya satvas rajas tamas  Layers of Mind and Bodies
Correlation of Levels or Mind and Body
Kosa(1) Mind(1) Esoteric Body(2) 
	Psychological Mind(3) annamaya body physical animal kamamaya crude astral 
 (emotional)conscious manomaya subtle causal 
 (intellectual)subconscious atimanas supramental 
 (lower causal) --  unconscious vijinanamaya subliminal 
 (middle causal) --   --  hiranmaya golden 
 (subtle causal) --   --   The Frequencies of Mental Levels 
 The Chakras and the Physical Body
 
Correlation of Levels or Mind and Body
Chakra Nerve Plexuses Vertebra(1) 
	Physical Systems Muladhara Sacral and Coccygeal 4th Sacral  --  Svadhisthana Sacral 1st Lumbar? Urogential Manipura Solar(Coeliac) 8th Thoracic Digestive Anahata Cardiac 8th Cervical Circulatory Vishuddha Superior, Middle, and Interior Cervical 3rd Cervical 
	Respiratory Ajna Pituitary Body and Interbrain 
	1st Cervical Autonomic Nervous and Hormone Sahasrara Cerebral Cortex, Entire Nervous System 
	 --  All Tissues of the Body  Psychological Theories and the Chakras 
 Consciousness in Different Systems
![]()
| [Previous] | [Top] | [Index] | [Next] |